sunset_beach.jpg
March 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

My Links

Harrisonburg Blogs (I'm the webmaster)
Sheldon, my favorite webcomic

RECENT COMMENTS

Jul 19 - Dave Yates said:

As a full blown peacenic, I feel that Privacy is a constitutional right. for individuals! Any society that wants to remove this human right from any of us needs to be disbanded. as a patriot, I see nothing patriotic about the patriot act, which I beleive to be the brainchild of skull & bones. Give america back to the people! And above all else, give peace a chance


Jul 19 - Dave Yates said:

As a full blown peacenic, I feel that Privacy is a constitutional right. for individuals! Any society that wants to remove this human right from any of us needs to be disbanded. as a patriot, I see nothing patriotic about the patriot act, which I beleive to be the brainchild of skull & bones. Give america back to the people! And above all else, give peace a chance


Dec 13 - VANCE said:

8.6 MILLION, DOUBLE WHAT WE DID NOV 5. ANYTHING LESS WILL BE SEEN AS A HUGE FAILURE BY NAZI MEDIA!


Dec 13 - Briann said:

Oops.... you needed two decimal places. Please make my guess 6.35 million ... :D


Dec 13 - Briann said:

I love this.... My guess is 6.3 milion. :D


Dec 13 - mason said:

Ok well, that's 9 guesses (plus 1 that doesn't count because he didn't leave an email address). I just need to see one more, otherwise I'm buying myself a 1.75 quart box of Mayfield Selects on Monday. Someone else out there must want to try their hand at guessing the soon-to-be-set new record for online political donation in a single day. Get it closest and you can use the money to buy your own 1.75 quart box of Mayfield Selects.

And by the way, thanks to all those who've already guessed. You guys are cool.


Dec 11 - knick said:

$7,777,777.77

[no email address = no valid entry :(]


Dec 11 - gid said:

your link to digg does not work because of the ']' in the link.
[Fixed it, thanks!]


Dec 11 - tony said:

5.5 million


Dec 11 - Lou P. said:

$6,499,999

[Since 6.50 million was taken, yours gets logged as 6.49]


SEARCH



ARCHIVES

March 2009
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
December 2006
September 2006
August 2006
May 2006
December 2005
August 2005
March 2005
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
Hosted by
CHATTABLOGS

March 17, 2009

Sound and fury - the manufactured AIG bonus scandal

Somewhere in a back-room in DC, a small group of powerful men fretted about how they could possibly redirect the public outrage over the soon-to-be-revealed details about the final disposition of most of $180 billion taxpayer dollars.

The sum was staggering, but that was a point in their favor. Once people start stringing phenomenal-sounding numbers together, be it hundreds of millions or hundreds of billions, it all starts sounding the same. So yes, the billions sent to Goldman Sachs, Societe Generale, and assorted smaller players would surely make the news, but if they could manufacture a sufficiently noisy scandal, they figured they could redirect public rage against those whose only crime was asking the government to stop their firm from going out of business. The distraction was so brilliantly executed, and the media so willing to lap up every tidbit of mock outrage, that all public discussion of those irrevocably squandered billions now seems like so much silence.

Does no one else realize what happened? Banks who decided to make risky loans, covered by these exotic policies, absolutely should have been forced to face at least some of the consequences of those loans. We didn't bail out AIG so much as we bailed out these banks whose fast and loose credit policies inflated the housing bubble and wrecked the global economy.

Obama was never outraged by bonuses. If he were, he could have said so last month back when Treasury was first alerted to the fact that they were about to be paid. But if the whole distraction engine hadn't gone into high-gear when it did, we'd all still be talking about how incredibly stupid our government officials were (and former candidate Obama prominently among them) to spend so much money to prop up AIG, without so much as an assurance from the assorted policy-holders that they'd be willing to accept a reduction in their payouts. Prior to the bailout, we had the leverage. The insured were facing the risk of getting almost nothing if AIG were simply allowed to collapse. For some reason, we discarded that leverage in our rush to fill the ultimate money pit.

It's an old saw that when the government has to bail out an institution for whatever reason, the investors and creditors are forced to take a major hit, and the taxpayers are always the first to be repaid once the business returns to profitability. Somehow I don't imagine that many of those billions will ever be recovered, and I don't think 80% of AIG is much compensation.

So why didn't it happen this time? I don't know anything for certain, but I don't believe it's mere coincidence that one of the largest holders of credit-default swaps was Goldman Sachs, and that prior to becoming Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson was its CEO. He had to know how much his old firm was counting on those policies paying off, and if you think that wasn't an ever-present thought in his head as he was negotiating the original AIG bailout, then I've got a sweet deal on a bridge just for you.

But while I'm mad as heck over finding out where the money went, I'm angrier over the crucifixion going on over those bonuses. A few key people came up with the idea for these exotic policies that ultimately tanked the entire capital position of the world's largest insurer. For them, I have no sympathy. But they stopped selling them in 2006. The outrage over those key executives' compensation is already 3 years out of date.

So who got the bonuses this year? Most of them are just regular employees. Some of them might have had a hand drawing up those credit default swaps a few years ago, but they were just doing their jobs. And even the executives who were present when AIG reported that $60 billion loss in the fourth quarter aren't all responsible. They were simply at the helm when the federal government used their company as a conduit for passing money to assorted financial institutions.

In my book, $165 million dollars is so much less than $180 billion that I simply cannot fathom why people are even paying attention to it. Be mad, but not at the people who got paid for doing their jobs. Be mad at the ones who pissed away a trillion dollars (and counting) in Wall St bailouts.

Posted by locolobo at 9:26 PM | Comments (0)